School-to-Prison Pipeline Symposium

Friday September 21st 2012 was School-to-Prison Pipeline Symposium (hopefully annual symposium).  This symposium was sponsored primarily by the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) and the Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration (JRA).  This was possibly the first opportunity to discuss the pipeline in a very public venue.  I, and others I work with have been having this discussion.  In fact many at the symposium have voiced concerns that the community has been voicing concern over the pipeline for 20+ years.  So what’s new??

This isn’t a rhetorical question…

During the Symposium there was certainly an open discussion about the reality of the pipeline.  This isn’t debated by many.  African American, Black and Hispanic youth are disproportionately represented in all school discipline statistics.  They are disproportionately represented at every grade level.  They are disproportionately represented in special education.  Furthermore, they are not any more poorly behaved then white students.  They are more often referred for similar behavior and they experience harsher punishments when referred.  While there may be some room for debate around these issues, the conversation wasn’t and generally isn’t about whether this problem exists (even from conservatives).  The discussion generally focuses on what to DO about it.

Sadly, I didn’t hear much in the way of solutions…  Two schools were represented as locations where change is taking place.   Lincoln High School in Walla Walla implemented a “compassionate schools” model.  While this is a great pilot project it is a project in an “alternative high school.”  First Creek Middle School in Tacoma is implementing Restorative Justice in their school.  Yet, this project is just beginning.  Largely the community is without answers.  Real policy solutions are essential for this discussion.

If the problem is “pushing out students” whatever policy schools/community implement they must change the “push out” effect.  Reducing suspensions will never change the problem.  While certainly there is some value in reducing the ineffective tool and its negative consequences, there needs to be serious work to change how we think about discipline.  (Soap Box) Restorative Justice when implemented with fidelity is a policy tool that changes the dynamics of discipline.  RJ is a system that holds youth accountable, engages and meets the needs of the victim, and supports youth in staying in school.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

City Club of Tacoma – Juvenile Justice in Pierce County

September 5th 2012, was a dinner/networking event put on by the City Club of Tacoma.  This particular session was devoted toward a presentation by the Juvenile Justice Department of Pierce Co.  The presentation focused on what the Juvenile Justice Dept is doing to reduce the disparity in outcomes for African-American/Black youth.  Pierce Co. has done great work to reduce the over all detention rate of youth.  Over the last 10 years there has been a significant push to reduce detentions.  At the same time there has been a reduction in juvenile crime.  The presentation focused on strategies that have reduced detentions as well as targeted strategies that reduce the racial disparity.

What was interesting? …

Dr. Gordon of the University of Puget Sound asked a question….  How are these policies different than those we have?  Or in other words, are these changes really “changes” are are they just fine tuning?

These go to the heart of the policies in question.  I immediately went to Jon Kidde’s work regarding the “social discipline” window.  He has modified and expanded on the work of Ted Wachtel.  The Social Discipline window outlines 4 categories of behavior.  From a policy stand point a policy may be permissive (not doing), punitive (doing to), enabling (doing for), or restorative (doing with).  while the work done by the Pierce Co. Juvenile department is truly commendable it still remains squarely in the “doing to” or punitive policy box.

It is important to note that this is difficult to change.  Creating policies that are truly different are challenging on a number of levels yet, essential to creating lasting change.  It is my feeling that disparity will persist, so creating policies that are restorative will minimize the damage done by disproportional punishment.

The question remains… how do we engage youth in the process of repairing the harm done by their actions?  How do we do this “with” youthful offenders?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment