Restorative Justice Center of the Northwest

A relational approach to conflict
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Restorative Justice 101
  • Restorative Justice Center of the Northwest
  • Who am I: Contact
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Youth program quality, the experience of youth.

Posted on October 30, 2014 by rjfacilitator

The Bridge Conference was Monday and Tuesday of this week. I was pleased to be presenting both days. It is such a wonderful time to meet with all my colleagues from around the state who are working to improve quality across the afterschool and youth development (AYD) field.

IMG_0554.JPG

First off I want recognize Brooke Beckwith, my co-facilitator and soon to be partner at the Restorative Justice Center of the Northwest. This was our first time collaborating and working together in a real way. I will speak more about Brooke in an upcoming post. Before I move on I want to say, we will both be using the youth program quality frame work to support AYD programs in King and Pierce Counties as well as in our own work.
The question that was raised several time over the conference was “what is the experience of youth?” When you work in Restorative Justice it is essential to maintain the perspective of the youth. Not just by adult self reflection but by engaging in real dialogue with those youth most impacted by the system. It is not enough to develop a well meaning system, it is not enough to work hard at balancing power, only those who are experiencing the system in real time have the true perspective on the system. So practitioners need to be mindful of not only how they set up the system but how the system allows for true and honest feed back and adaptation. This work leads to the high quality programs that increase post-secondary outcomes across the board.

Semper,
Nicholas

Posted in Opinion or Personal Account | Tagged Afterschool and Youth Development, AYD, Restorative Justice, YPQI | Leave a comment

A Continuum of Restorative Justice

Posted on September 29, 2014 by rjfacilitator

RJ-Continuum-Jon KiddeRESTORATIVE JUSTICE: principles and indicators

Engagement

Involve those impacted/affected, including the community, (i.e. victim, family, neighborhood, school, offender) in the resolution.

Engagement of person(s) harmed:

  • Evidence that demonstrates the program provides meaningful invitations to participate (e.g. more than one personalized contact attempt. A single form letter would not demonstrate this).
  • Evidence that demonstrates those harmed have the opportunity to provide input and reasonably shape the outcome. (engagement & restoration)

Engagement of person(s) who have caused harm:

  • Evidence that demonstrates that the program actively involves participants in understanding the harm and related needs as well as their ideas and input in determining the agreements/outcome.

Community Engagement

  • Evidence that demonstrates the program actively involves the community in the response to the needs illuminated/harm experienced by all parties.

Accountability

Encourage appropriate responsibility to address needs and repair the harm.

  • Evidence that demonstrates the program ensures that the participants acknowledge responsibility for the harm caused.
  • Evidence that demonstrates the program provides opportunities for the person who caused the harm to develop an understanding of how his/her actions affected others.
  • Evidence that demonstrates the program facilitates the development of agreements that directly relate to repairing the harm as defined by those directly affected—victim and offender.

Restoration

Acknowledgement and repair of the harm caused by, and revealed by, wrongdoing.

  • Evidence that demonstrates the program ensures that the participants acknowledge responsibility for the harm caused.
  • Evidence that demonstrates completion of agreements focused on repairing the harm.
  • Evidence that demonstrates satisfaction among those harmed with the outcome of the process used.

(This was first posted on Howard Zehr’s blog.  Jon Kidde wanted to make sure that is was noted: this work is adapted from and influenced by Howard Zehr’s blog).

_____

My personal reflection: In an attempt to be constructive and critical.  Clarity around the last section… “Restoration.”  What does that mean?  For my work it means restoration of relationships.  This could be the “rebuilding” or “building” of relationships.  In schools it is essential to focus on the restoration between teachers and students.  This relationship will set up students for success or failure.

Beyond this critique I find the discussion regarding what is Restorative Justice essential.  The fidelity of practice is something the RJ community needs to be focused on.  As schools, juvenile justice, and other youth serving programs seek to implement RJ practices they will need to have some guide regarding the richness of their systems.  I hope we can come together to support high quality RJ systems.

Semper,

Nicholas Bradford.

Posted in Opinion or Personal Account | Tagged implementation, Jon Kidde, Restorative Justice, RJ | Leave a comment
← Older posts
Newer posts →
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 498 other subscribers
  • Recent Posts

    • Dear Restorative Justice: Our Student Isn’t Responding
    • We Learn The Work By Doing The (Messy) Work. Reflections On The First Annual NC4RJ Youth Conference
    • Accountability, What Does It Really Mean?
    • The Case That Got Me Hooked On Restorative Justice
    • What Are These Circles?
  • Archives

    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • April 2018
    • October 2017
    • August 2017
    • March 2017
    • September 2016
    • March 2016
    • October 2015
    • August 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • July 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • August 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • Accountability
    • Afterschool
    • Afterschool and Youth Development
    • Altruism
    • Appleseed
    • AYD
    • brene brown
    • Circle process
    • Cleveland
    • conflict
    • COOPERATION
    • cultural approriation
    • cultural competency
    • culture
    • Disproportionality in Discipline
    • Dispute Resolution Center
    • education
    • education policy
    • Education research
    • empathy
    • Florida
    • High Capacity
    • Highline
    • IIRP
    • implementation
    • international education
    • interpersonal conflict
    • John Hopkins
    • Jon Kidde
    • Juvenile Justice
    • King Co. Juvenile Justice
    • Kitsap Co. DRC
    • leadership
    • leadership style
    • oakland
    • OCR
    • Office of Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • opinion
    • OSPI
    • OUSD
    • PBIS
    • pilot project
    • race
    • Rand corp
    • restorative approach
    • Restorative Justice
    • restorative practices
    • RJ
    • RJ circles
    • School-to-Prison Pipeline
    • school discipline
    • school resource officers
    • schools
    • Seattle
    • Seattle Public Schools
    • Shame
    • Spite
    • SROs
    • Strategies
    • Tacoma
    • Talking circles
    • Team Child
    • Ted Wachtel
    • theft
    • Tools
    • Truancy
    • Urban Strategies Council
    • Washington State RJ
    • Whidbey Is Institute
    • YDEKC
    • yes!
    • youth
    • youth writing
    • YPQI
    • zero tolerance policies
  • Categories

    • Cleveland
    • Opinion or Personal Account
    • Projects
    • Research
    • RJ Systems
    • School Safety
    • School to Prison Pipeline
    • Uncategorized
    • Video
  • What is Restorative Justice?

    Restorative Justice is a philosophy for dealing with conflict. Primarily it rejects the idea that punishment (pain) is or has been an effective way to deal with harm in our communities. Instead it is based on the idea that "offenders" "victims" and the community need to be actively engaged in making amends and meeting the needs of all parties involved in the situation. Primarily this involves an active accountability and an act of apology. For a more detailed discussion follow to blog post RJ 101.
  • Recommended Books

  • Nicholas Bradford

    • rjfacilitator's avatar rjfacilitator
Restorative Justice Center of the Northwest
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Restorative Justice Center of the Northwest
    • Join 89 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Restorative Justice Center of the Northwest
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...